IIT-Chemplast, Bergkamp and the Ashes

(Also posted at : http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/iit-chemplast-bergkamp-and-the-ashes)

I had a few spare hours this morning and I felt the time would be well spent by visiting the I.I.T. Chemplast Cricket Ground. The Ground nestled in the Indian Institute of Technology’s lush campus in Madras brims with scenic beauty. With the dense trees enveloping the sides of the Ground and a small, yet pretty, red-bricked pavilion adding to its grandeur, I would imagine this to be one of the more attractive sports venues in India.

Anyway, Tamil Nadu were scheduled to play the Railways’ cricket team in a Ranji Trophy Super League Group A game here, and I thought watching a few hours of first-class cricket wouldn’t hurt, especially considering the setting. Braving the rush-hour morning traffic, I reached the venue, on time, at 9:30 AM only to be greeted with the site of grounds-men working furiously to get the field ready. Madras during the monsoons can be rather strange. A glance outside my window in the morning had suggested that, although it was a cloudy day, there weren’t any signs of overnight rain. As it turned out, it had rained in other parts of the city, and particularly harshly at Guindy, where the Ground is located. Not one to be instantly disillusioned, I waited, sitting under one of the giant trees that surround the Ground, reading my book – The Perfect 10 by Richard Williams, in which the author portrays the careers, oddly enough, of eleven different playmakers, ranging from Pele to Zinedine Zidane – but more on that later.

The Ground, from the boundary ropes, looked dry enough, but there were apparently a few wet patches in line with the fast bowlers’ run-ups and near the popping creases on both sides that were worrying the umpires. An inspection was scheduled for 10:30 and I decided to wait patiently until then. The captains, Dinesh Karthik and Murali Kartik, both had a walk to the middle, and as did T.N. quickies, C. Ganapathy and Lakshmipathy Balaji. Any hope of immediate play though was quickly quelled, with the patches near the crease continuing to trouble the umpires. The next inspection was scheduled for 12:00 noon, and I remained optimistic, hoping that even if the action commenced at 12:15, I could still, probably, watch an hour’s play before I had other matters to be concerned with. In the end, the inspection at 12:00 did not convince the umpires enough and the next bit of scrutiny was scheduled a further hour later. So I made my way out, and thanks to Cricinfo, I now hear that only eight overs were bowled, with T.N. ending the day on 26 runs for the loss of S. Anirudha.

The conditions, no doubt, made the visit mostly pointless, but I did get through substantial portions of Williams’s book. In essence the book is a depiction of a group of players, each of whom are his personal favourites, and who were all ‘conventional number 10s’ and celebrated for their playmaking. Essays on Ferenc Puskas; Pele; Gianni Rivera and Sandro Mazzola (a chapter is commonly devoted to the Milanese pair); Gunter Netzer, Michel Platini, Enzo Francescoli, Diego Maradona, Roberto Baggio, Dennis Bergkamp, and Zinedine Zidane constitute a chapter each. Having read a part of the book earlier, I reached up until the chapter in which he describes Bergkamp, by which time I found my thoughts drifting from the book’s contents to the sheer majesty of the Dutchman’s craft.

Much like Williams, I have a special reverence towards playmakers. Growing up as a Manchester United fan in the nineties and the two-thousands, it was rather difficult to appreciate Arsenal and their play, dazzling as it could be. But Bergkamp and Robert Pires – who was of course a wide midfield player – were exceptions in my abhorrence for Arsenal. Bergkamp’s technique, touch, control, passing, and shooting were all a delight, but his exemplary vision was, by far, his most laudable trait. His goal against Newcastle United in 2002, when he pirouetted around centre back Nikos Dabizas with a sublime piece of touch before slotting past Shay Given must surely rank as the finest piece of ingenuity witnessed in the Premier League. There have been goals scored, from tougher angles, with far greater ferocity, and possibly even with superior deftness in touch, but I doubt if any has been as inventive in its construction. It is for moments such as this that we watch sport and to be reminded of it, certainly made my visit worthwhile, even if conditions at IIT-Chemplast played spoilsport.

***

Tomorrow, the first Ashes test will commence at the Gabba in Brisbane. Unlike most previous tours to Australia, the visitors start the series as favourites, overwhelmingly so, in the minds of some. I think, though, the first test could be crucial in determining which way the series goes. Brisbane has seen unusually high amounts of rainfall this year, and while I hope there is enough cloud cover to assist James Anderson and Ben Hilfenhaus to charm us with their swing, I do hope the rain stays away, lest I be consigned to reminiscing about the clever geometry of Bergkamp’s play.

The North London Derby

(Also posted at: http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/the-north-london-derby)

Consecutive victories against Wolverhampton Wanderers and Everton that followed a home loss to Newcastle United prompted many to consider Arsenal as genuine title contenders this season. Their prophecies seemed that much more perceptive at the end of the first half of the North London Derby at the Emirates Stadium yesterday after Arsenal produced some of the most gorgeous football, that one can hope to see, to lead Tottenham Hotspur 2-0 at the break. At the end of ninety minutes though, with Tottenham completing a remarkable turnaround to take the honours 3-2, the familiar groans about a lack of steel in Arsene Wenger’s side resurfaced and some critics consider the loss as an effective death-knell to the club’s title challenge. The truth of the matter, though, is that individual games, and more so forty-five minutes of football, especially at this stage of the campaign, rarely determines the nature of the season as a whole even if, at times, indicative of a club’s strengths and weaknesses. If anything this game was more significant for showcasing Tottenham Hotspur’s growing eminence as opposed to any new-found vulnerability on Arsenal’s part.

Starting the game with Rafael Van der Vaart floating behind Roman Pavluchenko in a 4-2-3-1, Tottenham struggled to get a grip over the midfield in the opening period. With Cesc Fabregas pulling the strings in typically dazzling fashion, Alex Song at his harrying best and Samir Nasri continuing to sparkle, Arsenal began the game in stately fashion. The opening goal scored inside the first ten minutes may have partly been a product of goalkeeper Huerelho Gomes’s blunder and a lack of cohesion in Spurs’ defence, but Fabregas’s vision demonstrated by his through ball was as much a delight as was Nasri’s smart finish from the tightest of angles. The second goal that came on 27 minutes was a result of a move of captivating beauty, the kind of which that has come to symbolise Wenger’s team over the years. With three passes, Arsenal countered from the depths of their half to rip Spurs apart and created a chance that was daintily flicked home by Marouane Chamakh. Few more minutes of breathtakingly quick passing and movement followed before the half time whistle gave Harry Redknapp the chance to correct any tactical errors and help his team a mount a seemingly impossible comeback.

A fortnight back Newcastle United showed at the Emirates that a two-striker formation can be effective against top opposition, something which their neighbours Sunderland further attested at Stamford Bridge in a 2-0 victory against Chelsea. With Van der Vaart, Luka Modric, and Gareth Bale struggling to get on the ball, Redknapp brought Jermain Defoe on for Aaron Lennon, moving thereby to a 4-4-2 that saw Van der Vaart take up a narrow position on the right of midfield; Gareth Bale was also brought further infield, resulting in a tight quartet in the middle of the park that exhibited far greater control in the second period. Van der Vaart was not particularly impressive over the ninety minutes, but he played his part in each one of Spurs’ goals. On fifty minutes, he picked up Defoe’s header to release an onrushing Bale who stylishly finished with the outside of his left foot. Soon Spurs began to pressure the Gunners with Modric beginning to come into his own. It was a free-kick won by the quick feet of Modric that led to the equaliser. Van der Vaart’s attempt from the dead ball was imprudently handled inside the box by Fabregas, stationed in the defensive wall, and the referee had little hesitation in awarding a penalty. The Dutchman took the spot-kick himself, stroking the ball into the back of the net with alacrity. Having never won at Arsenal’s home for 17 years, and having failed to win at the home of any of the Big Four – Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal – in 69 attempts, the stage was set for the most glorious victory for Spurs. In the 86^th minute, Younes Kaboul who had had a torrid first half glanced home a superbly struck right-wing free-kick from Van der Vaart to win it for Spurs.

The victory heartened Redknapp enough for him to suggest after the game that Spurs are now genuine title contenders. "Chelsea are not as good as they were, Manchester United are not as good as they were … Tottenham are getting closer. Why can't we win it? Why should we be fearful?” he said. Spurs, it must be said, have been excellent against the best of opposition this season, not least against Inter Milan in the Champions League at White Hart Lane. Their first choice eleven may not be as well equipped as Chelsea, Arsenal and Manchester United or for that matter Manchester City, but they do seem to possess more strength in depth than any of these four. To judge their potential title credibility on the basis of this victory against Arsenal alone may be ill-advised, but Redknapp certainly seems to have the tactical answers and the players at his disposal to mix it with the best.

Vettel wins in style

[Also posted at: http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/vettel-wins-in-style]

A pulsating formula one season was brought to a fitting end at Abu Dhabi today. Sebastian Vettel, aged 23, clinched his first title, and became the youngest ever World Champion by winning at the Yas Marina Circuit with a drive of pace and purpose. Leading almost from start to finish, Vettel didn’t offer an ounce of a chance to the rest of the field, maintaining his concentration and tempo through the course of the race with aplomb.

Fernando Alonso, placed at the top of the championship going into the finale and starting from third on the grid, began the race as the favourite, to win his third title. At the end though, neither did Alonso possess the pace nor was his team’s tactics prudent. Slow off the blocks, Alonso slipped to fourth in the opening corner before pitting early and finding himself wedged in traffic, with Renault’s Vitaly Petrov keeping the Spaniard at bay for the best part of forty laps. It may be easy to say in hindsight, but had Alonso stayed on the track for longer, as Jenson Button did, he may well have secured the fourth place that he needed to lift the title.

Vettel, in tears on the slowing down lap after taking the chequered flag, has been undoubtedly the quickest racer this season, as evinced by his ten pole positions. A combination of ill-discipline and bad-luck may have seen him struggle to take grip of the championship – he never led the points tally prior to the conclusion of the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. But his three victories in the final four races of the season saw him seize the moment with a champion’s touch.

With Michael Schumacher returning to the grid, the season promised much even before it began. But the seven time world champion had a disastrous year, finding himself easily eclipsed by his teammate Nico Rosberg. The season though did not fail to lure. Rather strangely for Formula One, it has been remarkable, more for its on-the-track racing as opposed to off-the-track politics. For the first time in its sixty-one year history, Formula One saw four drivers – Alonso, Mark Webber, Vettel, and Lewis Hamilton – with a mathematical chance of lifting the title going into the final race of the season. But had Alonso won, Ferrari’s team orders to allow the Spaniard to pass Felipe Massa to victory at Hockenheim may have left more than a sour taste. Therefore, Vettel’s victory is, perhaps, a vindication of a philosophy that championships can be secured devoid of favouritism. Red Bull remained insistent in shying away from imposing team orders – although some may argue that they clearly favoured Vettel over Webber.

Alonso was, no doubt, desperately close to securing the title. But Ferrari as Massa’s poor form demonstrated have been ruefully off the pace. It was a product more of Alonso’s class than Ferrari’s pace that saw the Spaniard stay in touch with the Red Bulls and the McLarens. In the end, it was quite appropriate that the quickest racer on the field emerged victorious. Vettel’s maturity has soared with the season’s progress. Denied a victory at South Korea after leading with a few laps left to go, due to an engine failure, Vettel said to his engineers: ‘Well, it can happen – let's just go for it in the last couple of races.’ And didn’t he and Red Bull go for it? Two pole positions and two victories, at Brazil and Abu Dhabi, later, the German has secured, what I would imagine is the first of many driver’s titles to come.

The Diwali Weekend

(Also posted at :http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/the-diwali-weekend)

The Diwali holiday weekend gave me a lot of time to watch sport, and needing no invitation I readily indulged, almost unhealthily. Here are some notes from my gluttonous viewing.

***

Test-match cricket has once again proved to be a game of glorious uncertainties. New Zealand, lowly New Zealand, had India on the mat on day four of the first test-match at Ahmedabad. Had it not been for a fantastic partnership between Harbhajan Singh – who scored his first century – and V.V.S. Laxman – whose stock as a man for the crisis is ever-increasing – India could well have come a cropper. New Zealand’s resurgence, though, had much to do with a century each by debutant Kane Williamson, and Jesse Ryder. While they were both fine knocks, Ryder’s century offered a rare pleasure. It’s hard to imagine a man of his build taking part in any other sport of consequence, so to see him succeed gave us a glimpse of the joys that cricket can provide. His century wasn’t belligerent, as you would expect from someone his size, but was measured and methodical. Along with Williamson, Ryder ensured that ‘collectively’, the Kiwis punched well above their weight.

***

Football is a great leveller. Days after their outstanding victory against European champions Inter Milan, Tottenham Hotspur were brought crashing back to earth by Bolton Wanderers who fashioned a 4-2 victory at the Reebok Stadium. Although, Owen Coyle has got Bolton playing some pleasant football – a sharp contrast to the days of Sam Allardyce – much of their strength remains in the aerial ability of their strikers and the bulk of their midfielders. Kevin Davies who scored twice and Fabrice Muamba who covered almost every blade of grass on the pitch were both massive for the Trotters. But amid all the physicality little Stuart Holden, anchoring the midfield for Bolton, impressed the most. The, Scotland born, U.S.A international has shown himself to be an excellent reader of the game. Although he generally keeps his passing neat and tidy, he does possess the ingenuity to cut open a defence, when required.

***

Sunday’s Rome derby – widely regarded as one of the world’s feistiest football ties - failed to live up to its billing. Tactically, though, the battle did offer some elements of fascination. Both teams lined up in strangely asymmetrical formations that saw huge gaps on Lazio’s right and Roma’s left wing. But neither John Arne Riise nor Stephan Lichtsteiner – Roma’s left-fullback and Lazio’s right-fullback – could exploit this space. On the account of the football played, Roma probably deserved the win that they secured courtesy a penalty each from Marco Borriello and Mirko Vucinic. The victory helped keep intact Claudio Ranieri’s record of never having lost a derby in Italy as a manager. The result also sees Lazio’s lead over A.C. Milan at the top of the table trimmed by two points.

***

The league leaders in England, Chelsea, also had their lead slashed to two points after Fernando Torres returned to form to score two splendid goals at Anfield. Roy Hodgson lined Liverpool in a 4-4-1-1 – a system that he had used for most of his time at Fulham – with Dirk Kuyt floating behind Torres, Raul Meireles continuing as a right midfielder, and Steven Gerrard playing as a conventional central midfielder alongside Lucas Levia, who inarguably had his best ever game in a Liverpool shirt. Torres’s first goal, as impressive as it was – a dink over Petr Cech after he had glibly controlled Kuyt’s pass – was eclipsed by his second goal that was a thing of captivating beauty. The Anfield crowd purred with delight as the Spaniard collected Meireles’s ball and curved it around a bemused Cech to find the bottom left corner. Didier Drogba reportedly suffering from a fever was brought on for the second half, but it was to no avail. Liverpool retained their shape with aplomb and controlled proceedings wonderfully well in the second period. After a turbulent start to the campaign, Liverpool are now only 5 points adrift of fourth placed Manchester City. Much work remains to be done at the club, but with Torres and Gerrard – who scored a hat-trick after coming on a substitute against Napoli on Thursday in the Europa League – returning to form, I’d expect Liverpool to secure European qualification with ease.

***

Paul Scholes, remains one of the most influential midfielders in England. Manchester United were utterly awful for much of the 74 minutes they spent without Scholes on the pitch against Wolverhampton Wanderers. Although the little maestro didn’t have a direct impact on the game, the shift in United’s rhythm and tempo upon his arrival was palpable. His slight feints and changes in pace to find space in the middle of the park and the precision of his passing were a joy to behold. United have lost several players under Sir Alex Ferguson’s twenty-four-year rein and have managed to find a way around it, either by means of a straight replacement or a tweak in the system. But replacing Scholes, when he does quit, could well be Ferguson’s hardest ever task, assuming of course that the task does fall upon him and not his successor.

See below for the Guardian chalkboard that graphically shows Scholes' completed passes.

by Guardian Chalkboards

'Purposeful Practice Makes Perfect'

Also posted at: http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/purposeful-practice-makes-perfect)

Matthew Syed’s book – Bounce: How Champions Are Made – is an interesting even if not an entirely illuminating read. Syed, formerly Britain’s number one table-tennis player and presently a journalist with the Times, argues that ‘purposeful practice,’ and not innate talent, plays the most crucial role in moulding a champion. He relies on examples from a variety of fields, and on Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers, to conclude upon the 10,000 hour rule: that a person acquires mastery of a skill by practicing purposefully for a period of at least 10,000 hours. Syed uses his own success in table tennis as a case-in-point. He says it was a combination of circumstances – 24-hour access to a table-tennis court, and the presence of a world class coach in his area – and rigorous practice that casted him into a top table-tennis player. How else, according to him, could a small road in Reading have produced a glut of table-tennis champions? – Silverdale Road contained an astonishing number of the nation’s best table tennis players.

Syed cites several instances in an endeavour to establish the superiority of practice over talent, but his argument isn’t particularly novel, even if the evidence adduced may well be considered as its further proof. In a way it’s flattering to think that had I practiced as hard and as purposefully as, say, Sachin Tendulkar did, I may well have perfected the skills that make a champion cricketer. But as compelling as the evidence may be, the romantic in me makes me want to believe in the ‘innate’ gifts that lend a god-like status to some sportsmen.

The book’s core arguments may not be particularly thought-provoking, but Syed provides several other fascinating insights. One such is the role of the Placebo Effect in moulding a sports champion. He cites the examples of triple jump legend Jonathan Edwards, and Muhammad Ali, for whom religion played the part of the Placebo. Edwards, once a devout Christian, when asked if religion played a crucial role in his success, said: “Without doubt. Looking back, I can see that my faith was pivotal to my success... It provided a profound sense of reassurance because I took the view that the result was in God’s hands and that God was on my side. It enabled me to block out doubt in the moments before I was due to jump.” Likewise, Muhammad Ali, who prior to the Rumble-in-the-Jungle bout against George Foreman, a fight that Foreman was favoured to win, said: “How can I lose when Allah is on my side?”

Syed has also sought to dispel any notion of black superiority in running. The abundance of successful Kenyan middle-distance runners, he argues, is a product more of circumstance than genes. He says that a startling majority of the Kenyan runners come from the Nandi district, a small region that is marked by its hilly terrain. High altitude as research has shown is an excellent environment to build endurance. This coupled with the fact that most Kenyan children have to run more than 20 kilometres to reach their school everyday means that they accumulate incredible amounts of practice time before they are sixteen – a phenomenon that Syed argues is directly linked to the superfluity of Kenyan runners.

But, perhaps, the most fascinating aspect of the book is Syed’s views on drugs. He endeavours to find a middle road between prohibition and full scale legalisation. He says that the safety of a drug is determined by the quantity of its administration, in most cases, and that drugs are not by definition safe or unsafe. In most endurance events, the key to success lies in efficient transmission of oxygen to the muscles via the red blood cells. The percentage of red blood cells known as the haematocrit level (HCT) in the body can be enhanced either by injecting EPO – a hormone banned by the World Anti Doping Agency – or by training at high altitude. It is only when the HCT level is elevated above 55 % in the body that risks of a heart-attack increase. When the level stays below 50 % there is no risk, whether it’s achieved by an infusion of EPO or by training at an altitude. It is interesting to note that it is only EPO which is banned, and not training at an altitude. Syed adds that WADA has spent millions of dollars in trying to figure out a foolproof testing model for EPO. Instead he suggests that all blood-altering techniques must be legalised, and that WADA must directly test for HCT, which is a considerably simpler process. Similarly, for steroids, it would make considerable sense in Syed’s opinion to test for the symptoms of over-use as opposed to the mere use of a steroid, ‘which when used moderately can improve strength and aid recovery without causing significant and damaging side effects’.

Return of the Trequartista

(Also posted at: http://www.criticaltwenties.in/uncategorized/return-of-the-trequartista)

More than two years back, I had written on the death of the trequartista – the conventional number 10 who looks to operate between the lines of the opposition’s midfield and defence. The position’s demise was a product, chiefly, of formations incorporating straight lines, and the emergence of spoilers in midfield. As the impressive Zonal Marking website points out, one of the predominant trends of the noughties was the declining role of the classical ‘number 10’. Lionel Messi, and Wayne Rooney, two players who in previous eras may have been perfectly suited for the role, either attacked from the wings, or played in more advanced positions. But with the emergence of the 4-2-3-1, the prototype made famous by Spain, with its World Cup triumph, the trequartista has returned from its grave, albeit with a more varied function. Players donning the role are now required to be more versatile, and to not merely act as the creative fulcrum of their team, but also to perform a more complete task.

This year’s World Cup finals in South Africa saw, at least, three of the semi-finalists, Spain, the Netherlands, and Germany, play with an old-style playmaker, even if as more complete versions. Each of them employed a 4-2-3-1, albeit, in their own unique fashion. Xavi Hernandez, although deployed, sometimes, in a deeper role by Barcelona, played ahead of Xabi Alonso and Sergio Busquets for Spain, while an unusually cynical Dutch team, utilised Wesley Sneijder in a role not too dissimilar to the one he plays for Inter Milan. The revelation, though, was Mesut Ozil, who used his dazzling technique to superb effect for Germany, supported ably by Bastian Schweinsteiger and Sami Khedira, who helped dictate the tempo of the game from deeper positions in midfield. Even Uruguay, the fourth semi-finalist, who employed a formation largely akin to a 4-4-2, used Diego Forlan as a withdrawn striker. Forlan looked to combine the role of a creator with the goal-scoring that he is now renowned for.

In many ways, the Argentine term for the playmaker – the enganche – describes the task of the player better. The enganche is the one who acts as the hook, between the midfield and the striker(s). The term, though, could be just as applicable to a player operating deeper in midfield, looking to link the defence to the midfield. Most modern teams tend to play with a double hook – one operating between the defence and midfield, and another between the midfield and the frontline, with a third central midfielder remaining largely static. Without going into excessive detail on the roles of individuals, it may be said that there is one central midfielder operating as the hook between the backline and the defence, one central midfielder remaining largely static in the centre of the park, and one central midfielder tying the midfield to the frontline. The latter is the one, commonly referred to as the playmaker, the heart-beat of the team if you please. But such a categorisation is anachronistic, for the responsibility to create play is far more spread out in the modern day scenario.

The additional responsibilities of the playmaker are also a result of the phenomenon of using inside-out wingers – playing right footed players on the left wing, and vice-versa. This calls for greater attacking verve from the full-backs, who are the only source of attacking width for the team, causing one of the central midfielders to often drop into the backline. Consequently, if the designated playmaker fails to drop deeper, considerable space could be conceded in the middle of the park. Sometimes though, the numerical demarcation of a formation fails to paint the entire picture. Last season’s treble winning Inter Milan side shaped as a 4-2-3-1, but the defence sat deep, and the anchors in midfield looked to operate more as play-breakers than playmakers. And with Samuel Eto’o and Goran Pandev used in wide positions, a huge chunk of the responsibility to create rested on Wesley Sneijder, much like it did, on conventional playmakers of the years gone by. No doubt, he excelled at the role, but the alignment is more of an exception than the rule in modern-day football.

In England, the prevalence of the 4-4-2, with both the central midfielders adopting a largely box-to-box role, was exploited to great effect, first by Eric Cantona, and later by Gianfranco Zola and Dennis Bergkamp, who slid deeper into the gaping hole between the opposition’s midfield and defensive lines. The natural progression should have seen teams place one of the midfielders in a withdrawn position, with the space made vacant by such a midfielder filled by one of the central strikers. But the development didn’t occur until continental styles began to enjoy greater influence in the country.

It is fair to say that the Premier League lacked in tactical sophistication for much of its existence. In fact, for most of its time, positional categorisations did not include a ‘second striker’ or a ‘playmaker’. But in the last decade, the league has progressed significantly, so much so that even revered exponents of the 4-4-2, Sir Alex Ferguson and Arsene Wenger, have tweaked their systems to suit the needs of the time. No doubt, Manchester United continue to use the system for a lot of their Premier League games, but a lot of their success over the last four years has come on the back of an adaptability to various tactical systems. Wenger seems to have more or less settled on a 4-2-1-3 of sorts this season, with Cesc Farbegas acting as the modern-day playmaker, a lynchpin of sorts for the team. Alex Song looks to offer the muscle, and either Denilson or Jack Wilkshire play from deeper in midfield, but as ball-players. Fabregas is given greater freedom to operate closer to the front three, a position from which he can make maximum use of his artistic vision. The difference, though, from playmakers of yesteryear is that Fabregas, while not particularly renowned for his tackling, is a player vested with far superior responsibility.

Carlo Ancelotti, who used a unique system – one involving two advanced playmakers, in Kaka and Clarence Seedorf – during his time at A.C. Milan, has tended to operate with a similarly wing-less system at Chelsea, but one devoid of particularly inventive playmakers. Three of his midfield four look to shuttle up and down the pitch, while Jon Obi Mikel acts both as a defensive shield, and as a hook between the defence and the midfield. Nicolas Anelka, more often than not, used as a second striker is given freedom to drop into the hole, or to run the channels. The team therefore, lacks a designated Number 10, but the vitality of Florent Malouda, and Michael Essien, sees the pair perform dual roles for the club. Ancelotti hasn’t yet had the time to shape his squad to suit his style, but ultimately I see a more stereotyped Number 10 operating ahead of Essien and Mikel in the middle of the pitch for Chelsea.

Tottenham Hotspur’s tactical set-up this season is quite fascinating, in that it showcases the contemporary prototype very well. Against Everton, last Saturday, they lined up with Peter Crouch as a lone striker, and Aaron Lennon and Gareth Bale as traditional wingers. The key though lied in the central midfield, where Wilson Palacios and Sandro played a half each as the defensive shield in midfield, and Luka Modric operated as the hook deep in midfield, and Rafael Van der Vaart was used as the advanced playmaker.

Interestingly the World Cup also saw the return, albeit fleetingly, of systems involving a back three. This would normally entail a corresponding trident in midfield that includes a more conventional playmaker. Chile, under the enigmatic Marcelo Bielsa, shaped up in a 3-3-1-3, utilising either Jorge Valdivia or Matias Fernandez as the playmaker. No doubt, their tactics were at times reactionary – shifting to four at the back, when up against teams that played a single centre-forward – but viewed independently, it proved revelatory, and offered considerable viewing pleasure. Europe though remains quite obsessed on four-man defences. Napoli, perhaps, represent the greatest exception. Paolo Cannavaro, Hugo Campagnaro, and Salvatore Aronica line up at the back, with Edinson Cavani, and Ezequiel Lavezzi constituting a fluid attack, that has Marek Hamsik operating in the hole. Hamsik, again, belongs to the newer brand of playmakers, ones who are just as comfortable tracking back, as they are dictating the flow of the attack.

The Egyptian national team has been another exception in this regard. They may not have entered a World Cup Finals since 1990, but they’ve won the last three editions of the African Cup of Nations deploying a three man backline. Egypt boasts two tremendous wing-backs in Sayed Moawad and Ahmed Fathy, which allows them to play narrow in midfield, with both the second striker, and one of the three central-midfielders looking to operate in the hole. Their three man backline also means that the central midfielders are not required to drop deeper than normal, allowing them to both out-muscle teams in the middle of the park, and to utilise the skills of their playmakers fully.

The decline of the classical playmaker also saw the emergence of ball-playing holding midfielders, as opposed to pure spoilers in the Claude Makelele mould, as pointed out by Zonal Marking. This recent resurgence of creators competent to play in the middle could also be seen as a direct consequence of the decline in spoilers. But that would mean tactical changes have been merely oscillating back and forth. Such an analysis oversimplifies the issue. Besides, the versatility of the modern-day playmaker has made it that much harder for teams to field a pure spoiler. Someone like Sneijder, who is as much at ease operating behind a centre forward as he is playing from the left, can easily float into spaces left unoccupied by the spoiler.

In the final analysis, there is no doubting that the central playmaker has returned to the fore in recent times. But as a consequence of attacking full-backs, inverted wingers, and the presence of a midfielder operating almost as a third centre back, (which in itself may be consequence of the earlier two trends) the trequartista, while continuing to operate in an almost indefinable position, is a far more complete package.

An Elegant Eleven

Also posted at: http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sport/an-elegant-eleven

In the lead-up to Cricinfo’s selection of the best test team of all time, Suresh Menon picked an Elegant XI, ‘a group who couldn’t be graceless if they tried’. The Eleven while boasting players of renowned elegance, such as David Gower and Gundappa Vishwanath, does not contain a single player who I have witnessed live on T.V., let alone in flesh. Hence, the present exercise to list an Elegant XI comprising mostly of players that I have seen, at least on occasion, from the stands.

1. Saeed Anwar: In the most graceful manner, Anwar could combine crafty placement and expert timing to devastating effect. His drives through cover-point – using his sinuous wrists to guide the ball – were in particular a sight to cherish. Most of his 194 runs at Chepauk in an ODI against India were made with the aid of a by-runner, but by god, was it gorgeous!
2. Michael Vaughan: Although a crisp driver through the offside, Vaughan’s stand out stroke was the one-legged pull shot. Invariably timed to perfection, he made full use of this expertise on the fast tracks of Australia. Quick to grasp the length, he always seemed to have time to play his strokes – something, which he utilised in an artfully pleasing manner.
3. V.V.S. Laxman: Perhaps nobody can boast of having played as many aesthetically appealing knocks under the most trying circumstances, as Laxman has. Australia and a crisis seem to bring out the best in him – causing what may have otherwise been a pretty 30 or 40 to turn into a knock of majestic beauty, and decisive importance.
4. Mark Waugh: A batsman of extraordinary grace and ability, the younger Waugh made batting look ridiculously easy, so much so that it was sometimes mistaken for carelessness. The flick off the toes and the square drive hit with purity were, in particular, pleasing to the eye. Waugh also had the rare quality of being both languid and imperious at once. Even his sashay down the track against the spinners was a thing of beauty – almost balletic in its execution.
5. Mohammad Azharuddin: Forget the supposed technical deficiencies; Azhar at his best was a sight for the gods. He used his supple wrists to generate spectacular results. Balls from several inches outside the off-stump would be despatched to the mid-wicket boundary with contemptuous ease.
6. Damien Martyn: Of them all though, Martyn was the finest. He could make batting look both ludicrously, easy and beautiful. Irrespective of the format, his batting remained pristine; unbothered it seemed from the outside happenings. His cover drive could be so brutal that it is embarrassing to call it pretty, but it certainly was the jewel in his crown of splendid strokes.
7. Kumar Sangakarra: I have picked Sangakarra more for his batting than for his wicket-keeping. With keepers increasingly focusing on their willow-work as opposed to their glove-work, the days of the elegant wicketkeeper are, perhaps, long gone. Amongst the recent lot, though, none has batted more pleasingly than Sangakarra. A top-handed player, Sangakarra has some of the typical left-hander’s elegance about him. Although effective on both sides of the wicket, it is his flamboyant drives through the offside, which stand out as the hallmark of his batting.
8. Wasim Akram: Akram, when in full flow was magnificent to watch. The things he could do with the ball boggled the mind. With only a short run-up to the crease and a whiplash of an action, he generated prodigious swing. He not only conquered an art form, but also thickened its horizons.
9. Shane Bond: The fine art of swing bowling has always fascinated me. And nobody in recent times has performed it with such graceful aplomb as Shane Bond has. Boasting a fluid run-up and a classical action, Bond at his best could frighten with pace as well as swing.
10. Daniel Vettori: Let’s make no mistake about this: Vettori is no Bedi. But in his pomp, he performed his skill with polish and precision. In recent times, his action has undergone much tweaking, a result largely of persistent back problems. But the younger Vettori, bowled classically, defeating batsmen both in flight and with turn.
11. James Anderson: Anderson does not possess a fancifully elegant run-up or an action that can lure, but his ability to swing the new-ball has its own mesmerising charm. With a brand new Duke in his hand, in overcast conditions in England, he can provide the grace through the swing.